"The present crisis characterized by degraded soils, yield stagnation and decline in Agricultural productivity is a result of years of indiscriminate use of chemical fertilizers, catalyzed by the subsidy policy. The newly proposed subsidy reform is old wine in new bottle and it will continue to promote use of chemical fertilizers and hence cannot solve the problem. The degraded soils needs to be rejuvenated if it has to yield and the only way forward is ecological farming." said Gopikrishna, Sustainable Agriculture Campaigner, Greenpeace India.
Finance Minister during his budget speech expressed concern over the declining response of agricultural productivity to increased fertilizer usage in the country and proposed a shift to a nutrient based subsidy regime instead of the current product pricing regime to ensure balanced usage. However experiences and research studies prove that yield cannot be sustained with recommended dose/ balanced application of chemical fertilizers.
The budget allocation for 2009-10 for fertilizer subsidies is about INR500 billion. Ultimately the Government plans to adopt a direct subsidy system where cash is transferred to the farmers directly for purchase of fertilizers. But this policy doesn't take into consideration any eco-friendly organic fertilizers.
"While it is important to give income support to farmers, the Government needs to provide support for ecological farming if future food security has to be ensured. It's high time that Government starts looking into models and mechanisms through which it can support ecological farming", added Gopikrishna.
The recent Greenpeace India report, Subsidising Food Crisis refers to a 14-year study in Punjab to highlight the fact that rice yields declined even when the recommended rates of nutrients (N-P-K) are applied. Based on the report Greenpeace India demands that the Government needs to look into an alternate subsidy system that promotes ecological farming and use of organic soil amendments, shift the subsidy money allocated for chemical fertilizers to sustainable ecological practices in agriculture and re-focus scientific research on ecological alternatives, to identify agro-ecological practices that ensure future food security under a changing climate.
As part of the demonstration, Greenpeace activists were trying to set up a gigantic balance scale outside the Parliament premises. The balance scale was a symbolic representation of the budget allocation for fertilizer subsidies. The pan representing chemical fertilizers proved heavy with lot of monetary allocations whereas the other pan representing ecological farming looked empty. The "food security meter" tilted towards food crisis.
No comments:
Post a Comment