D-Link’s Green Agenda: Interview with D-Link CEO, Tony Tsao


How do you rate the general awareness of eco-friendly and energy-saving products and technologies in the region?


I feel the awareness among the consumers is constantly increasing – both in the region and globally. Continuous efforts by governments, municipalities and non-government organisations, users that are more concerned about energy-saving technologies and vendors who respond to these needs are contributing to this development.


As the global leader for the networking industry, we are doing business in many countries across the world, consequently we feel obliged to take a lead in recognising our corporate social responsibility as an international entity.


Clearly, not only are we developing technologies that help save power, reduce heat dissipation and thus lead to fewer emissions and a smaller carbon footprint, but we are also committed to the protection of the environment way earlier in the manufacturing process of our products.


At D-Link, we aspire to keep the impact on global warming to a definite minimum. We consider this more than just a responsibility, we believe, it’s a necessity.  Our numerous memberships and certifications with several eco-conscious organisations and programs demonstrate this fact and are all part of D-Link’s green design.


 


Could you give us more details of D-Link’s green design?


We have been pursuing a ‘green agenda’ since 1999. To name a few components of the agenda, D-Link has been the first networking manufacturer to gain the ISO 14001 standard certificate. All our products comply with RoHS (Restriction of Hazardous Substances) and the WEEE (Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment) directives, which cater to the proper disposal and recycling of products. D-Link is also an ENERGY STAR partner, and works to create energy-efficient products and practices. This summer, 127 of our networking products have earned the Energy star label and we are constantly working on improving our products in order to have gradually most of our products certified. D-Link is moreover the first company in the networking industry to earn a full 5-star TÜV Rheinland STAR certification, whose spirit is Sustainability, Trustworthiness, Accountability, and Responsibility (STAR). This certification testifies that D-Link meets requirements to satisfy public concerns regarding the internal and external environments. Internally, we are planning to further increase the percentage of recyclable material in our product packaging.


Saving energy has become crucial in all areas of life – globally, and every sector can play a vital role in combating climate change. Often, it's the little innovations that make the biggest differences. Most people don't think about the power consumption of their modems and routers. But for those who do, we have been working on providing our customers with solutions that comply with their needs for energy-efficient equipment.


 


What’s the range of ‘Green products’ you have in the market?


We launched our D-Link Green products since December 2007. The implemented power-saving features work in two ways. Firstly, by monitoring the activity of the Ethernet interface, our D-Link Green switches and routers automatically detect if the ports are active and put those in a “sleep mode”, where there is no data transmission obvious – thus saving energy on these particular ports.

D-Link Green products are furthermore able to detect the actual cable length and adjust the power usage accordingly. For example, if the cable length is 20 m, the switch interface requires less power for the data transfer as opposed to the amount of power required for a cable length of 100 m – which is the default length applied by the majority of networking vendors.


As a result, D-Link Green products help saving up to 44 per cent power, some of them even up to 80 per cent depending on the networking scenario.  

Most of our products have been certified with the Energy Star label designed to promote and recognise energy-efficiency in our products. The majority of D-Link products are equipped with the latest nano-chips and use ecologically intelligent chip sets, too.


Our Green products don’t sacrifice in performance and functionality, since these smart technologies incorporated into D-Link Green operate on levels that are not connected to the speed or amount of the data being transmitted as such.


We are constantly working on improving our products in order to serve our increasingly eco-conscious customers and support the preservation of a healthy planet better.


We are proud of the fact, that D-Link has led the “green computing” initiative since our company’s founding in 1986, and is on the forefront of developing environmentally and socially responsible products.  You’ll find more details at the D-Link Green microsite, http://green.dlink.com.tw


 



 

UN Secretary-General urges citizens to join WWF's Earth Hour

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon today urged citizens around the world to join WWF's Earth Hour to demand action on climate change.

In a video-taped address, the Secretary-General said that Earth Hour – which takes place on Saturday 28th March – promises to be “the largest demonstration of public concern about climate change ever attempted.”

“Earth Hour is a way for the citizens of the world to send a clear message. They want action on climate change.” said Secretary-General Ban.



Speaking just a week before Earth Hour rolls out across thousands of towns and cities across the globe, Ban underlined the seriousness of climate change and the need for a global climate deal to be agreed when the world's leaders meet in Copenhagen this coming December.

“People will be telling their representatives to seal a deal in Copenhagen. A deal at the climate change talks that will protect people and the planet. We need an ambitious agreement. An agreement that is fair and effective. An agreement based on sound science.”

Secretary-General Ban went on to underline the seriousness of climate change and the scale of the task ahead. “We are on a dangerous path. Our planet is warming. We must change our ways,” he said. “We need green growth that benefits all communities. We need sustainable energy for a more climate-friendly, prosperous world. This is the path of the future. We must walk it together.”

WWF's Earth Hour is being hailed as the biggest ever global movement – a vote for the future of planet earth. Hundreds of millions of people are expected to take part by switching off non-essential lighting for an hour. Cities from Las Vegas to Sydney, from Cape Town to Beijing will go dark for an hour.

Ban said that the United Nations would be doing its bit for Earth Hour. “In New York, we will switch out the lights at UN Headquarters. Other UN facilities around the world will also take part.”

And he concluded: “I urge citizens everywhere to join us. Please send a strong message on climate change. Together we can find a solution to this most serious of global challenges.”

Poznan Day One: Daily Press Briefing

UNFCCC Executive Secretary briefs the media at the conclusion of the opening day of the COP-14 conference at Poznan on December 1, 2008.

More information at the UNFCCC website.

Buckhard Varnholt: Bank Sarasin’s Green Champion

As early as 1989, Bank Sarasin wisely identified the growing importance of environmental and social issues in asset management. In September 2007, the bank appointed Burkhard Varnholt as the CIO and head of the asset management, products and sales division. In an exclusive interview with Earthwitness, Varnholt explains why the ‘green economy’ will happen and succeed.

Bank Sarasin, was founded in 1841 and is one of Switzerland’s leading private banks today; its core activities include investment advisory and asset management services for private and institutional clients, as well as an investment funds business. Bank Sarasin’s headquarters is in Basel, with offices in Zurich, Geneva and Lugano in Switzerland. The Sarasin group has offices in Dubai, Guernsey, Hong Kong, London, Munich, Paris and Singapore.

Banks and Financial institutions are jumping into the green bandwagon; the cynics have been wondering rather aloud, whether this is just another public relations circus. When faced with the question a banker would rather dodge, Varnholt is quick to respond, “It is an emerging industry which requires capital to start and which is of intriguing interest to investors to end with. So there is obviously an important intermediation role for the banks to bridge the gap between demand and supply of capital.”

Varnholt is quite candid, as he adds, “It’s funny to see how the banking industry breeds new climate change and clean energy experts overnight. People who were up until two weeks ago analysing banks or utilities or what you have are reinventing themselves as clean technology experts.”

“That’s the nature of the banking industry which one should sometimes take with a bit of a smile,” admits Varnholt.

There are very clear signals that a new economy is emerging, the green economy. Companies would owe their success in the green economy to how fast they can adapt to new market conditions, which will heavily be governed by various environment and sustainable protocols. Varnholt emphasises that the banks have a very important and crucial role to play in this emerging economy.

The markets know this truth very well, if the banking industry supports a new system, hardly does it fail to deliver. Listening to Varnholt, a top-notch banker should provide us clear indications to whether the green economy is for real or just a marketing mantra.

His words are more than reassuring; Varnholt exudes confidence as he says, “The green economy will happen but I don’t think it will be called green because of the greenery. The main selling point is not going to be greenery; I think the main selling point will be it is cheaper to run on renewable technology. What will need to happen therefore is more scientific and technological processes to improve the efficiency of power sources, which already is further ahead than most people think.”

Varnholt is of the opinion that many people underestimate the speed of change, “Scientific and technological progresses typically accelerate and it doesn’t come in the same quantities every year; there are quantum leaps that occasionally takes you years ahead.”

Talking about the acceleration of technological change, Varnholt mentions the observations made by the noted US futurologist Ray Kurzweil, "In the first 20 years of the 20th century, we saw more advancement than in all of the 19th century. And we won't experience 100 years of progress in the 21st century - it will be more like 20,000 years of progress at the current rate."

Varnholt puts Kurzweil’s observation into perspective, “It sounds like a daunting challenge or comparison but I think it’s very true and what underlies this statement is really the acceleration principle that triggers the scientific and technological progress. And that’s what investors and many observers still underestimate.”

As the conversation progressed, the intellectual capacity of Varnholt, who has authored four books, and also taught at the famous Massachusetts Institute of Technology, became a bit too obvious. With the measured calmness of a professor, Varnholt says, “The Stone Age didn’t come to an end because the world ran out of stones; it came to an end because people developed better technologies than stones. And that will happen at some point with fossil fuels. At some point Brazil will be to the biofuels industry what Saudi Arabia is to the oil industry.”

Millions of poor people in third world countries, especially in the continent of Africa are starving to death, with no access to clean drinking water or food. Helpless people live in economies decimated by civil war or simply without the support of a state. In this context, we have heard pledges to write off their loans, and rock concerts to raise money and awareness of this human tragedy in Africa. The very idea that food grain will be used not to feed the poor but to produce biofuels to drive cars and trucks goes against the grain of decency and humanity.

Varnholt’s views on the subject are very candid, “We have been very critical of generating ethanol which has a negative energy balance. You need to put in more energy than what you get out of ethanol when driving a car on it, and also because of the food versus fuel issues. This is just a matter of science and technology progress. At some point we will see technologies that will allow us to transform virtually all kinds of bio-waste into ethanol and at that point you will no longer have competition on ‘food versus fuel’. I think the food versus fuel debate is one that is highly politicised and I entirely sympathise with those who find out that it makes no sense to burn food. But I think no one will be talking about it in two years and surely in four years we will be much further ahead.”

Varnholt says that a pro-environment approach has been at the heart of Sarasin policy for many years. “In contrast to most in the industry, we do actually have a team which has been focussing on clean energy for over a decade.” Sarasin built what was then the largest solar platform in Switzerland, on top of its headquarters building in Basel, to provide itself with clean energy. “Sarasin has been very keen on investing in the solar and related industries and as a consequence today, we can look back on the longest investment track record in this industry that I am aware of.”

On whether the big industries are doing enough, to provide the leadership, to make a positive change to the environment, Varnholt is of the opinion, “The industry will always take the leadership role when there is money to be made and frankly that is the only way to resolve some of the current pollution issues.” Industry needs large amounts of energy; the current electricity prices are high, and presumably will be higher in the future. Varnholt notes, “There is a very significant economic gain for the industry to be very interested in renewable energy and electricity.”

Varnholt explains the market realities rather bluntly, “It is not a matter of wanting the industry to take the leadership, and the industry will only do what serves it well. It doesn’t do a thing out of dogma but really out of mercantile considerations. But I think those mercantile considerations are already there.”

Sarasin has been astutely investing in renewable energy. On Sarasin’s power fund, which has been operating for more than 10 years, Varnholt confirms that the fund only invests in renewable power sources and related industries such as solar, wind, water and other renewable energy. “The fund always comes up in industry comparisons as the top performing fund not only in terms of performance but also in terms of risk management, and also in length of its track record; its been running for 10 years.”

He adds, “Sarasin’s power fund has been outperforming even the second best performing fund; typically outperforming it by more than 50% over the last two to three years. It’s probably one of the best performing funds we have, especially given length of the track record.”

Talking about the green economy, Varnholt is emphatic, “This is one of the fastest growing industries that I can see worldwide, which is going to continue to surprise investors and bankers to the upside, courtesy of its growth.”

In spite of his extremely busy schedule as a Swiss banker, writer, and academic, Varnholt finds it necessary to invest time in the humanitarian work in the African continent. In 2004, Varnholt set up the charity, Kids of Africa –The Swiss African Orphanage (www.kids-of-africa.com). The charity has built and maintains a home for up to 100 orphaned and abandoned children in Kampala, Uganda.

It is not a grand success story that is often discussed in banking magazines and journals; Varnholt’s work with Kids of Africa is not one of monetary rewards, but one that gives him a sense of accomplishment, one that he can cherish for the rest of his life. It is also a wonderful example of commitment to best practice in social responsibility.

“It’s something that I came across accidentally. A good 10 years ago I received a letter from a Ugandan asking me for help to bring up himself and his siblings. I sent him some support and I was intrigued by his writings and wrote to him that I would like to meet him in person.”

“That was a good eight to nine years ago, and ever since we have stayed friends. I helped him and his siblings get through their education. When they were ready to leave college, there weren’t jobs around in Uganda. We started to wonder what he should be doing with all the education he has. That’s really where the idea came up because he studied civil engineering. Why not buy a plot of land build some houses which gave him something to do and set up children’s village for other abandoned orphaned children, of which there are woefully too many in the country.”

“It was three years ago when we decided to put the idea into reality, I did the registration and bureaucratic work and he began to build the houses. We then hired the staff and today the village has grown wonderfully into a little big children’s village called ‘Kids of Africa’ which is an enormous challenge and responsibility but also a great source of happiness.”

Throughout the conversation with Varnholt, one couldn’t miss the feeling that here is a man, who is not your typically-sophisticated-banker – talking in numbers and percentages. About his African experience, Varnholt says, “It has been a wonderful experience seeing that one can actually do things even without a lot of professional experience and material, but by applying a lot of energy and common sense to it.”

It is hard to find high profile bankers like Varnholt, who take a simple approach to life. Here is a man who understands the significance of a green environment and sustainable business practices. The truth is we need many more Burkhard Varnholts, to make that ‘green difference’ in the banking sector, for the green economy to work and succeed.

(By Santhosh Shyamsundar, February 2008 edition)

Conflict or cooperation: The stark choices facing a world running short on water

Rivers and lakes are no respecters of international boundaries – indeed they are often the basis of them. And what is true of surface water rivers is even more true of the unseen water underground.

Which competing states own the water that crosses, forms or lies under their borders? What mechanisms exist to stop water being held, diverted, or polluted by one country to the disadvantage of others? What remedies exist if this happens? What basis can there be for the sharing and management of such water for the maximum mutual benefit? What usually happens when too many demands are placed on limited resources in the absence of any procedures or frameworks for considering claims or resolving disputes?

These are not trifling issues. Half the global land surface area and 40 per cent of global population lies in the catchments of the 263 rivers forming or crossing boundaries. Three quarters of the world’s countries face potential disputes with neighbours over shared rivers, lakes, wetlands or aquifers.

And as the world becomes more and more concerned over the future of water supplies, it is pertinent to note that nearly two thirds of freshwater flows are involved, tied up in rivers such as the Amur, separating China and Russia, and the mighty and multi-state watercourses of the Amazon, Mekong, Congo, Danube and Rhine.

In the Middle East five per cent of the world’s people survive on one per cent of its water with control of the River Jordan and access to its water a dominant issue in a volatile area. Egypt has been ever ready to threaten upstream States on the Nile over any plans they may have for the river. Shortages of water and agricultural land are widely understood to be a key factor underlying the conflict in Darfur and other conflicts and instability in the region.

India has exchanged harsh words with China over the latter’s failure to give warning of flood and landslide events in Tibet which have caused loss of life along the Brahmaputra. And India is only one of a whole range of south and south east Asian States concerned about Chinese plans for power generation and water diversions in the headwaters and major tributaries of the Brahmaputra and Mekong systems. Potentially affected are Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Kampuchea and Vietnam.

But, India and Pakistan have fought three wars without unduly disturbing the delicate system for distributing the waters of the Indus. This is a remarkable tribute to the potential of international and regional legal instruments to govern arrangements for sharing and caring for international water systems.

Diplomacy over water is hardly new – indeed, arrangements to share water and cooperatively build and operate irrigation systems are now believed to have been among the earliest and most influential precursors of social and political organization from China and South East Asia to Egypt and Mesopotamia and over to central America.

A recent publication by UN Water also notes the placating power of water agreements, noting that in the past 60 years there have been only 37 cases of violence between states over water, which it ascribed to the existence of around 300 international agreements on water.

Not all agreements are equal or adequate, however. Problems have endured from poorly formed and inequitable agreements where one party gets the bulk of the water, such as those the colonial British drew up for the Nile and those over rivers shared between the United States and Mexico.

Cooperative management frameworks exist for only about 40 per cent of the world’s international watercourses. Most are only partially covered, with about 80 per cent of agreements involving only two parties. The lack of unifying principles behind agreements gives multi-river states problems with administration of inconsistent arrangements from one river basin to another.

Work to resolve these issues started well over 60 years ago, with some noted international lawyers with the International Law Commission being tasked with coming up with a framework for an international agreement that could not only reduce the potential for conflict but also help shape and guide equitable sharing and appropriate management of international waters.

Their efforts came to fruition in 1997, when an overwhelming majority of countries in the UN General Assembly voted for an International Convention on the Law of the Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (the UN Watercourses Convention).

The Convention’s aim was to “ensure the utilization, development, conservation, management and protection of international watercourses and the promotion of the optimal and sustainable utilisation thereof for present and future generations”. This was to be accomplished, for example, by procedures for notification of planned measures and exchanges of information on the overall health and status of river systems as well as the events such as floods likely to be of interest to downstream neighbours.

Consistent with the UN’s charter, states are bound under an “obligation to seek peaceful settlement of disputes”. They are also encouraged to adopt compatible management schemes for shared water basins and measures for dealing with water pollution and the protection of the ecosystems of international watercourses.

Voting for the Convention were 103 countries (with another three later notifying a yes vote). Voting against were just three nations, Burundi, China and Turkey. There were 26 abstentions.

The convention was to come into force once ratified by 35 countries. However, the UN Watercourses Convention has languished in limbo, with only 16 so far signing up – Finland, Germany, Hungary, Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, Libya, Namibia, Norway, Portugal, Qatar, South Africa, Sweden, Syria and Uzbekistan.

International conventions often do take some time to gather sufficient signatories to come into force but the slow progress of the UN Watercourses Convention has puzzled many observers of the international scene.

Possible reasons advanced have included “treaty congestion”, or a lack of knowledge about the convention in critical areas of government in some developing countries.

Only one or two countries continue to express public opposition to it, going to the extent of trying to clamp down even discussions on the convention at related international meetings. For example, among the most contentious topics being negotiated for a ministerial declaration for the 5th world water forum was whether to include reference to the convention, with several countries arguing for and only a few against.

Even unratified, however, the Convention is exerting considerable positive impact. China, a state opposing it with the words that states had “indisputable sovereignty over a watercourse which flowed through its territory” has nevertheless adhered to some of its principles in water agreements with some of its 15 neighbours. Many other states have similarly drawn on the principles and sometimes even the language in framing bilateral water agreements.

The International Court of Justice has also used the convention as a reflection of international law in the field from the time it was voted on. And the International Law Commission is currently drafting a compatible international legal instrument to give more adequate coverage to aquifers, which builds upon the UN Watercourses Convention, adjusting it to the specific case of groundwater flowing under the territory of two or more countries.

With more advocacy from WWF and other groups, and nations which include key river states such as Benin, Ghana and Iraq and major international donor countries such as Norway, Sweden and The Netherlands, awareness of the convention is increasing and a number of new countries are shortly expected to announce their intent to sign, taking the number of signatories past the halfway mark.

Palestine, though not yet a nation, used the occasion of the World Water Forum in Istanbul to announce that it would sign up to the Convention as a matter of priority on attaining statehood. This would mean that four out of the five states in the Jordan River basin had acceded to the convention, giving it the highest coverage by the convention.

With climate change impacts increasingly making themselves felt in freshwater systems around the globe, countries are also perceiving that the UN Convention could be a vital support to increasingly urgent work on climate change adaptation. WWF’s own work on climate change adaptation for freshwater systems is showing more and more that the river systems most able to cope with predicted impacts will be those where natural functioning is preserved or restored.

The final word should go to Alfred A. Oteng-Yeboah, of Ghana, who noted at a recent Convention on Biodiversity meeting the high potential for conflict over water in West Africa, where the seven major water basins cross numerous boundaries: the River Niger (in 10 countries), River Senegal (in 4 Countries), River Gambia (in 4 countries), the Chad Basin (encompassing 3 West African and 2 Central African countries), River Volta (in 6 countries) and River Koliba-Kombal (in 2 countries) and also considered the high risk of misunderstanding or conflict in the use of these shared watercourses.

“Thus, in the view of Ghana, the importance of this kind of co-operation cannot be over-emphasized, and we understand that there is a strong role for the [UN Watercourses Convention] in the removal of risks of misunderstanding and conflicts associated with use of such water courses.”

“We think that we need this Convention now and urgently so and it should enter into force as soon as possible to be able to perform the roles ascribed to it.”

Source: WWF.

Share water to make peace – IUCN

Istanbul, Turkey, 18 March, 2009 (IUCN) – More people and less water could mean increased conflict for scarce shared water resources. But in its latest report IUCN clearly shows how better cooperation over shared rivers can help governments avoid water crises.

“We cannot understate the importance of water for life on this planet; it’s as necessary as the air we breathe,” says Julia Marton Lefèvre, IUCN’s Director General. “Governments must realize that river basins, not national borders are the boundaries around which effective water management must be drawn.”

Released ahead of World Water Day on March 22, IUCN’s latest publication, “Share: Managing Water Across Boundaries”, shows that international rivers – those shared by neighbouring countries – provide an estimated 60 percent of the world’s freshwater. There are some 260 international river basins in the world, which cover nearly half of the Earth’s surface and are home to 40 percent of the world’s population.

“The problem with shared rivers is that if nations don’t cooperate they can all end up trying to use the same water more than once,” says Mark Smith, Head of IUCN’s Water Programme. “When they do, the environment loses out on the water it needs, and development fails while tensions rise. Cooperation on rivers means the reverse; the benefits of a healthy environment and development can be shared, while promoting peace.”

“We have alternatives to oil but there is no alternative to water,” adds Marton-Lefèvre. “During these times of financial crisis we cannot lose sight of the fundamental economic importance of water for life and commerce. A clear message is needed from governments in Istanbul as water users will only share water cooperatively when they believe it’s their best option.”

Promoting peaceful cooperation and developing synergies between authorities at all levels, is a global challenge. Traditionally, the focus in negotiations over shared rivers has been the apportioning of water. Once the water is divided, each country tries to optimize management within its borders rather than across the shared basin.

Through working together on a basin-wide approach, authorities in India and Pakistan have better managed the Indus River to support better water conservation, but also to protect food security for local populations. Such experiences are teaching us that a better way forward is to focus not on the volume of water parceled out between competing consumers, but instead to focus on basin-wide benefit sharing.

“Pragmatic solutions have been found in the past but better solutions must be sought for the future – this report shows Ministers meeting here in Istanbul the best way forward is to prevent water conflict before it starts,” adds Smith. “The need for nations to cooperate in the management of shared water resources is growing – all against a backdrop of considerable climate uncertainty.”

Southern Africa’s freshwater species in firing line

Istanbul, Turkey, 19 March 2009 (IUCN) – Many freshwater fish, crabs, dragonflies, molluscs and aquatic plants are at risk of extinction in southern Africa if its rivers and lakes are not protected from developers, according to IUCN.

The study, released at the World Water Forum by the IUCN Species Programme in collaboration with the South African Institute for Aquatic Biodiversity, shows that seven percent of species are known to be regionally threatened or extinct. But this figure will skyrocket unless freshwater species conservation is considered in development planning.

These species provide food for local people and some of them, such as the mollucs, help purify the drinking water. The study shows that while 77 percent of species are not threatened with extinction, there is not enough information for the remaining 16 percent to determine their threat status.

“Here at the World Water Forum the trend is to think about water supply in terms of irrigation, hydropower and drinking water,” says William Darwall, Manager of IUCN’s Freshwater Biodiversity Unit. "People tend to forget about the species that live in the water but we can no longer afford to do this. We want developers to use the information on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species to work out how they can minimize the impact on freshwater species when they develop water resources.”

The results from the assessment of 1,279 freshwater species in southern Africa show that the more developed a country is, the more species are threatened with extinction. Of the 94 species threatened in southern Africa, 78 of these are found in South Africa, the most developed country in the region.

“We are in a unique position in Africa to avoid an extinction disaster,” says Julia Marton-Lefèvre, IUCN Director General. “Most developers have not taken freshwater species into consideration because they simply don’t have the information they need. We hope this study will change that and show that Africa’s water resources can be developed without causing thousands of extinctions.”

Three hotspots of species diversity have been highlighted in the report, including the area where the upper Zambezi meets the Kwando and Chobe rivers above Victoria Falls, the Komati and Crocodile river tributaries of the Incomati system in Mpumalanga, South Africa, and the Mbuluzi river basin, also in Mpumalanga, South Africa, and in Swaziland.

Many of southern Africa’s coastal drainages have sites which contain species that only occur in that area, including the Kunene and Kwanza rivers on the west coast of Angola, and the Rovuma and Pungwe and Buzi systems on the east coast of Mozambique.

“If we really want to save these species we must protect the rivers and lakes by looking at river basins as a whole,” says Mark Smith, Head of IUCN’s Water Programme. “We can’t just look at the parts that interest us economically or as natural areas. For our plans to work, we must manage them together, using all the tools we have to meet the needs of people and nature for water.”

The results of this report will be combined with similar studies currently being conducted in the rest of Africa. Case studies will be used to develop a series of Good Practice Guidelines to help developers and governments take freshwater species into consideration when planning water projects in Africa.

Protecting watersheds saves billions

Gland, Switzerland, 13 March 2009 (IUCN) – Protecting watersheds provides many of the world’s megacities with freshwater – and saves billions of dollars. This is the result of a new compilation of case studies by IUCN, published today ahead of the World Water Forum, held from 16-22 March in Istanbul, Turkey.

“Many of the world’s big cities have understood that protecting their catchment areas makes economic sense. Rather than chopping down the forests or draining their marshlands, they are keeping them healthy and saving billions of dollars by not having to pay for costly infrastructure to store water, clean it or bring it from elsewhere,” says Mark Smith, Head of IUCN’s Water Programme.

The Indonesian capital Jakarta gets its freshwater for free from some 60 rivers originating in the nearby Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park. The water is worth an estimated US$1.5 billion.

The Venezuelan capital Caracas relies on the rivers from Guatopo and Macarao National Parks for its freshwater provision. Today, those rivers continue to supply a constant flow of freshwater to the city’s 5 million inhabitants, consuming some 17 thousand litres of water per second.

Protecting freshwater sources also benefits nature. In and around South Africa’s Kruger National Park, better river management has helped improve water provision for some local rural communities – whilst at the same time preventing loss of aquatic life in the park.

“Kruger’s main five rivers have suffered from pollution and unsustainable water use upstream which led to some of them drying up completely. After implementing a large river-related programme with the agriculture, forestry and mining industries, we have seen an improvement in flows. Previously disappeared species have re-colonised, and fewer unnatural fish kills have occurred,” says Harry Biggs, Programme Integrator at South African National Parks and leader of IUCN’s World Commission on Protected Areas Freshwater Task Force.

During drier times, expensive arrangements like water transfers and trucking of water had to be made to meet basic needs of some rural communities living along rivers near the park, when they could no longer, as in the past, access water from rivers. For some of these communities, cleaner and more water is now available.

“Healthy river systems are essential to maintain the livelihoods of local communities. The objectives of sustainable development can only be achieved if nature continues to provide freshwater that everyone needs,” says David Sheppard, Head of IUCN’s Programme on Protected Areas.

Arctic nations take important first step towards saving polar bears

Tromso, Norway, Mar.19 (WWF): Five nations committed by treaty to conserve polar bears have come up with a resolution linking the future of the species to urgent global action on climate change.

“We are very encouraged by the final declaration from this meeting,” says Geoff York, polar bear coordinator for WWF International’s Arctic Programme.

“We were concerned that some countries were lagging behind the others in their commitment to dealing with climate change, but ultimately, the parties recognized climate change as the primary threat to the future well-being of polar bears. They also recognized formally “the urgent need for an effective global response that will address the challenges of climate change”, to be addressed at fora such as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change”.

The five Arctic nations signed a binding 1973 Agreement on the Conservation of Polar Bears that includes provisions to protect polar bears and their habitat.

The Norwegian government played a key role in bringing the parties together, and in setting high expectations for the meeting. Erik Solheim, Environment Minister of Norway told Norwegian television. “It would be an amazing crime against future generations if we did not save the polar bear.”

The meeting made some other important advances. It has agreed to come up with a circumpolar action plan for the management of bears, and to formally designate the Polar Bear Specialist Group of the World Conservation Union (IUCN) as the scientific advisory body to the Agreement. These were both measures proposed by WWF in advance of the meeting.

“Although we are generally very pleased with the meeting outcome, this is by no means the end of the story- it is the start on the path to polar bear survival,” says York. “The real proof of this new commitment to taking urgent and effective action on climate change is what leaders of these nations will commit to later this year. Ministers from these five countries are meeting in this same town toward the end of April at a meeting of the Arctic Council, and have a golden opportunity then to outline their national commitment to climate change.”

Ultimately, the polar bear nations must join with other countries at the UN climate conference in Copenhagen in December 2009 to sign an effective global deal on climate change that will save the polar bears’ Arctic sea ice habitat, along with the entire ice ecosystem.

20 years on, Arctic unprepared for another Exxon Valdez

Gland, Switzerland, Mar.19 (WWF): Two decades after the Exxon Valdez oil tanker struck an iceberg and spilt millions of litres of oil into the delicate Arctic environment, governments and industry in the region remain unprepared to deal with another such disaster, according to a new analysis by WWF.

With restrictions on oil and gas development lifted and increased activity making accidents more likely, the global environment group distributed rocks from Alaska’s Prince William Sound, still crusted with oil from the accident on 24 March 1989.

The rocks, together with a call for oil and gas no-go areas over sensitive Arctic environments and some of the world’s richest fishing grounds, were sent to ministers, officials and media in the Arctic countries still wrangling over arrangements to govern a renewed resource rush to the area.

“While there has been little improvement in technologies to respond to oil spill disasters in the last 20 years, the Arctic itself has changed considerably and is much more vulnerable today,” said Neil Hamilton, leader of WWF’s Arctic Programme.

“Sea ice is disappearing and open water seasons are lasting longer, creating a frenzy to stake claims on the Arctic’s rich resources – especially oil and gas development. Oil spills can be devastating to Arctic marine environments and given the current lack of oil spill response capabilities, we need a ‘timeout’ until protective measures exist for this fragile, special place.”

The report, Lessons Not Learned, recommends a moratorium on new offshore oil development in the Arctic until technologies improve to a point where an adequate oil-spill clean-up operation could be performed.

WWF also recommends that the most vulnerable and important areas of the Arctic be deemed permanently off-limits to oil development.

Such “no-go zones” should be based on the sensitivity and productivity of special priority areas where oil spill response would be next to impossible to clean up or where any spill would cause irreparable long-term damage.

These areas include Bristol Bay in Alaska, America’s fish basket accounting for 40 per cent of the national catch; the Lofoten-Vesteralen area in Norway; and the West Kamchatka Shelf in Russia. In all of these places WWF, with the largest global Arctic conservation programme, has teamed up with local people who also oppose the threat oil development poses to rich fishing grounds.

Lessons Not Learned recommends that all Arctic countries conduct comprehensive risk assessments that include industrial activities, shipping, petroleum development and anticipated impacts of climate change.

“Arctic countries should also adopt a comprehensive agreement for any accident and spill response that is Arctic-wide, has needed facilities in place and provides for joint action between countries,” Hamilton said.

“The Exxon Valdez spill has been the best-studied oil spill in history and scientists have found that even 20 years later, the damage from the spill continues,” said Margaret Williams, managing director of WWF’s Alaska program.

“Fishermen’s livelihoods were destroyed, many wildlife and fish populations still haven’t recovered and the Alaskan economy lost billions of dollars. We can’t let that happen in Bristol Bay or anywhere else in the Arctic.”

Business facing surging water risk

Istanbul, Mar.18 (WWF): A world running short of water is presenting a new category of risk to business that many have not even begun to appreciate, the World Water Forum in Istanbul was told today.

And while some leading companies have made great improvements in using water more efficiently in their own operations, they will need to look deep into their supply chains and into the performance of water regulators, warned WWF and noted US-based water research body, the Pacific Institute.

“If you are an efficient business sitting in a poorly managed river basin you are still exposed to extremely high water risk,” said Stuart Orr, freshwater manager at WWF International.

Water is so basic a commodity that many businesses do not realise the extent to which disruptions in supply or increases in price – both predicted with increasing frequency – can effect their operations.

“The companies that will best shield themselves from the unexpected will be those that have assessed water requirements and risks in both their direct and indirect operations and in an integrated way with other emerging risk categories such as with climate and energy,” said Jason Morrison, program director at the Pacific Institute.

Morrison used an example of a brewery in an area where climate change had impacted heavily on water supplies. The company not only found unexpected cost increases and reductions in its own water supplies but also rapid increases in energy costs as hydroelectric generation capacity was reduced and difficulties in sourcing barly and hops as water-short farmers put land into fallow.

“Water risk assessment should include physical risks, such as running out of water, and reputational risks where companies can be perceived as irresponsible users of a scarce resource by communities, consumers of their products, regulators or financiers,” said Morrison.

“Companies should also consider the risk of more onerous and costly regulation and financial risks as water shortages translate into higher energy prices, higher insurance and credit costs and lower investor confidence.”

The growth in instruments such as water footprint studies and industry standards for water use and discharges was an encouraging sign, but business, often together with civil society, should also become involved in urging better water policy and management overall, Orr said.

“It will be better for business to be seen making a positive contribution to public policy processes over water in a climate of water shortages rather than as a powerful player interested mainly in grabbing or defending its share of water,” Orr said.

Business involvement in improved water management can include advocacy and lobbying for better policies in company with civil society and communities, infrastructure and other partnerships with governments and water authorities, and financial support for infrastructure and capacity building, a key factor in the developing world.

APP’s forest clearing linked to 12 years of human and tiger deaths in Sumatra

Pekanbaru, Indonesia, Mar.18 (WWF): Most violent incidents between people and tigers in Sumatra’s Riau Province in the past 12 years have occurred near forests being cleared by paper giant Asia Pulp & Paper (APP) and associated companies, according to a new analysis of human-tiger conflict data.

The analysis, conducted by the group Eyes on the Forest, found that since 1997, 55 people and 15 Sumatran tigers (Panthera tigris sumatrae) have been killed during conflict encounters in Riau Province. Another 17 tigers have been captured and removed from the wild.

By overlaying the locations of these conflicts with government maps of pulpwood plantation concessions, Eyes on the Forest found a direct correlation between tiger conflict and the unsustainable forest practices of APP, its holding company Sinar Mas Group, and other associated companies that supply pulpwood to APP’s mills.

At least 147 of 245, or 60 percent, of all conflicts in Riau occurred in the Senepis area, where APP/SMG-associated companies have expanded their natural forest clearance operations in five concessions, mainly since 1999. Three of those concessions were expanded without proper license from the Ministry of Forestry.

Eyes on the Forest is a coalition of 25 environmental organizations in Riau, Sumatra, Indonesia. They include WWF-Indonesia, Jikalahari (Forest Rescue Network Riau) and Walhi Riau (Friends of the Earth Indonesia) and several other NGOs. The coalition was launched in December 2004 to investigate forest crimes and conflict in the central Sumatran province.

Sumatra is home to some of the most biodiverse forests in the world, however, half of the forest remaining in 1985 has since been lost.

“With so much forest loss, the tigers have nowhere to go” said Ian Kosasih of WWF-Indonesia, “In the last month alone, four tigers have been killed in Riau. There are fewer than 400 Sumatran tigers estimated to remain in the wild and every tiger killed is a significant loss to the population of this critically endangered subspecies.”

APP is responsible for more natural forest clearance in Sumatra – the only habitat for the Sumatran tiger – than any other company. Since it began operations in the 1980s, APP is estimated to have pulped more than 1 million hectares (approximately 2.5 million acres) of natural forests in Riau and Jambi provinces in Sumatra.

Currently, NGOs are concerned about APP’s involvement in forest destruction in Senepis, Kerumutan, Kampar and Bukit Tigapuluh forest blocks in these provinces. Eyes on the Forest calls on APP/SMG-associated companies to stop natural forest clearance immediately.

“APP/SMG-associated companies’ activities in Senepis are legally questionable and environmentally reckless,” said Jhonny Mundung, of Walhi Riau. “APP has recently made ridiculous public claims that it is leading tiger conservation in the area, when in fact it is jeopardizing the safety of local communities and pushing the tigers closer to local extinction. Global paper buyers should not be fooled: APP destroys forests and wildlife.”

Cleared areas around the Kerumutan forest have become a new hotspot for tiger conflict, with three incidents recorded already this year. Large area of this deep peat forest have been licensed for APP/SMG-associated companies and some sections have been cleared in recent years by them in what Eyes on the Forest believes is legally questionable logging.

In 2007, the Riau Police and the Indonesian National Police probed 14 companies as part of a widespread illegal logging case. Half of those cases were APP/SMG-associated companies, including one concession in Kerumutan (PT. Bina Duta Laksana) where one human-tiger conflict happened in February.

The Riau Police abruptly shut down their investigation in December 2008. However, authorities continue to investigate one company -- an APP/SMG-associated company, PT. Ruas Utama Jaya, which has concessions in Senepis.

“The Riau Police should continue probing the legality of natural forest clearing, including APP/SMG-associated companies’ activities, to ensure respect for the law, especially provisions that safeguard the environmental and social rights of Riau communities,” said Susanto Kurniawan from Jikalahari.

In February, the national Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) pledged to resume the cases of 13 companies and the House of Representatives’ Law Commission (III) supports this move.

Besides being critical habitat for tigers, Senepis, Kerumutan, Kampar Peninsula and other Sumatran peat forests in Riau are a globally significant carbon store; the carbon-rich peat soil is so deep that simply cutting the trees or disturbing the soil releases enough carbon emissions to impact global climate change.

Of all the natural forest lost from 1982 until 2007 in Riau, 24 percent was replaced by or cleared for industrial pulpwood plantations and 29 percent was replaced or cleared for industrial palm oil plantations.

UN report highlights growing water stress but could put more stress on protecting ecosystems

Istanbul, Mar.17 (WWF): A UN water report issued today gives a useful overview of a world growing increasingly short of water but puts far too little emphasis on the need to protect the natural environmental assets that supply and purify water, global conservation organization WWF said today.

Water in a changing world, the third UN Water Development Report issued by UNESCO at the World Water Forum in Istanbul, said water demand would increase due to population growth, rising living standards and changed food consumption patterns and the demands of biofuel production while water supplies were already near their limits in many countries.

WWF welcomed the report’s call for better governance and management of water and its observation that while the water sector is often taking more responsible approach to management “the key decisions about water are taken outside the water sector”.

“The report is relatively sympathetic to solutions that involve pouring concrete, without giving due recognition to the problems caused by the concrete pouring of the past,” said Dr Lifeng Li, Director of Freshwater at WWF International.

“We would have liked to see more emphasis on the importance of providing enough water for natural systems to keep functioning in order to keep providing water.

“One key contribution to water supplies running short in many areas is that the natural environmental assets that protect and purify water and help us cope with floods and droughts have been degraded through over-use and pollution.

The report notes that climate change will worsen the water situation in many already short countries but offers few pointers for adapting to this challenge.

“The key lesson of WWF’s on the ground work is that what best protects and improves the functioning of freshwater systems now is what will best protect them from climate change impacts in the future,”

The report also raises the likelihood of conflict over water between countries, regions and urban and rural users.

“We also find it puzzling that a report predicting more water conflict between countries fails to mention for the ratification and implementation of an existing UN treaty that would provide a basis for countries to share and jointly manage waters on their borders.”

The UN Watercourses Convention, approved by an overwhelming majority of countries in 1997, still lacks enough signatories to come into effect. The 263 water basins shared between two or more countries drain half the world’s land surface, account for nearly two thirds of global freshwater flows and are vital to the water supplies of 40 percent of the world’s population.

“Indeed, the convention fails to even gain a specific mention in UN Water’s brochure for World Water Day this coming Sunday, which is on the theme of transboundary waters,” Dr Li said.

5th World Water Forum

Held in Istanbul. More information at www.worldwaterforum5.org.

Protection of marine resources can help people adapt to climate change: Ministers

Mar.13 (WWF): Senior ministers from Timor Leste, the Solomon Islands and Papua New Guinea have described climate change as the biggest threat to their region and have called for better management of fisheries and marine resources to help protect coastal communities.



At a meeting of the six-nation Coral Triangle Initiative in the PNG capital Port Moresby this week, ministers from East Timor, Solomon Islands and PNG said climate change was an alarming threat to Pacific island nations dependent on marine resources, and needed to be urgently addressed through mutual political cooperation.



“Climate change, food security, marine and coastal resources are closely linked and policies must reflect this reality and must be mutually accommodating,” said Timor Leste Economic and Development Minister HE Joao Mendes Goncalves.



“The sustainable management of our fisheries is important for our ability to survive climate change and as a pre-requisite for the implementation of the Coral Triangle Initiative’s plan to protect marine environments and livelihoods at both national and regional levels.”



Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands and Timor Leste collectively make up the Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI), introduced by Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono at the APEC leader’s meeting in September 2007.



This week’s meeting was the final ministerial forum before Coral Triangle leaders gather in Manado, Indonesia on May 15 to announce details of a plan to protect marine ecosystems and food security in the region.



Solomons Islands Environment Minister for Conservation and Meteorology Hon Darcy Lilo said the Coral Triangle Initiative was an important corner stone of his country’s decision to develop, manage and conserve coastal reefs and fisheries resources.



“It is critical that we conserve and manage our marine resources widely so that these can contribute effectively to improving the livelihoods of our people,” Mr Lilo said.



Meanwhile, Deputy Prime Minister for Papua New Guinea, Hon Puka Temu said PNG needed to develop new government systems and processes that would support effective solutions to issues such as climate change and increasing land based population.



“It is critical that we manage this initiative carefully and move forward with a sense of urgency,” Mr Temu said.

“If we are to take advantage of the enormous opportunity that our healthy marine environment provides we need to manage it carefully in the face of many development pressures, including climate change.”



He said strengthened aid mechanisms and partnerships with key stakeholders were essential to achieving the aims of the Coral Triangle Initiative.



The World Ocean Conference and the Coral Triangle Initiative Summit will be held from May 11 to 15 in Manado, Indonesia, and are expected to result in the Manado Ocean Declaration, a definitive statement on oceans and climate change.

The Coral Triangle is recognised as an area of global environmental significance, with the greatest marine biological diversity on the planet. Seventy five per cent of the world’s known coral species, one third of the world’s coral reef area, and more than 3,000 species of fish can be found in the region.

“Marine resources in the Coral Triangle directly sustain more than a 120 million people and so with climate change threatening to alter habitats in the region, it is even more critical to manage marine ecosystems for ongoing food security of coastal communities as well as for the survival of many species,” said Dr Pet Soede.

Tuna spawning grounds can help Coral Triangle nations get better deal on fishing

Mar.10 (WWF): Asia Pacific fishing nations could use the presence of tuna spawning grounds to negotiate better prices and fairer fishing arrangements with foreign fishing nations, WWF said today.

The proposal was put forward as ministers started meeting in the Papua New Guinea capital Port Moresby this week to finalise a plan to protect marine environments and food security in the Coral Triangle region, covering waters between Indonesia, the Philippines, and the Pacific.

The area provides spawning grounds and migratory routes for tuna caught in the Indian, Pacific and Southern Oceans, which make up around 70 per cent of the world’s tuna catch.

“The region’s spawning grounds are essential to the world’s multi-billion dollar tuna industry and the world should be prepared to support their protection and effective management,” said Dr Lida Pet Soede, leader of WWF’s Coral Triangle Program.

“This can help Coral Triangle countries negotiate fairer prices and fairer fishing arrangements with non-Coral Triangle nations, who also fish in these waters.”

Dr Pet Soede said it was fitting the final meeting be held in Papua New Guinea as PNG has taken a leading role in efforts to bring more sustainability to the region’s tuna fisheries, which are critical to the food security of millions.

Managing Director of Papua New Guinea’s National Fisheries Authority, Sylvester Pokajam, warned of a collapse of the big eye tuna fishery unless fishing nations operating in the Coral Triangle introduced measures to make the fishery more sustainable.

“We can see a crash coming for tuna and this will be disastrous for many coastal communities in the Coral Triangle, where millions of people depend on healthy tuna stocks for food and livelihoods,” Mr Pokajam said.

“Here in PNG we have introduced fishing measures within our own zones in an effort to address the issue of overfishing, in particular where it comes to overfishing big eye tuna, but the success of these measures depends entirely on the willingness of other non-Coral Triangle nations to introduce similar measures.”

Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands and Timor Leste collectively make up the Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries and Food Security (CTI), introduced by Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono at the APEC leader’s meeting in September 2007.

This week’s meeting is the final ministerial forum before Coral Triangle leaders gather in Manado, Indonesia on May 15 to announce details of a plan to protect marine ecosystems and food security in the region.

The Indian Ocean Tuna Commission will meet in Bali at the end of this month to consider among other things a set of recommendations by its scientific committee to reduce fishing pressure on yellowfin tuna, which it says is likely to have reached an overfished state.

The World Ocean Conference and the Coral Triangle Initiative Summit will be held from May 11 to 15 in Manado, Indonesia, and are expected to result in the Manado Ocean Declaration, a definitive statement on oceans and climate change.

“With climate change threatening to alter habitats in the region, it is even more critical to manage marine ecosystems for the ongoing food security of the region and for the survival of many species that depend on the Coral Triangle’s unique marine environment,” said Dr Pet Soede.

Sweden sets climate goals example for EU

Mar.12 (WWF-Sweden): The new climate and clean energy package proposed by Sweden should serve as an example for all EU countries ahead of crucial global warming negotiations, WWF says. If followed by other industrialised nations the deal could lead towards a low carbon future and help combat climate change.

Sweden is just preparing to take over the EU’s rotating presidency and it is likely to play a major role during important international meetings culminating in the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, in December, where leaders from about 190 countries will try to agree a global deal to replace the Kyoto Protocol, which expires in 2012.

Sweden’s Environment Minister Andreas Carlgren said that his country now aims by 2020 for renewable energy to comprise 50 percent of all energy produced, for the Swedish car fleet to be independent of fossil fuels 10 years later and for the country to be carbon neutral by 2050.

“We think it is fantastic that the government recognises the important role that eco-efficiency plays in improving the economy,” Lasse Gustavsson, Secretary general of WWF in Sweden said.
“If the Swedish government can convince other industrial countries to adopt Sweden’s ambitious climate package, the world would be better suited for combating destructive climate change,” he said.

Sweden, which now plans to slash its greenhouse gas emissions by 40 percent from its 1990 levels within the next 11 years, was asked to cut CO2 output by just 17 percent.

The government said it would stay committed to the proposed goals and that they were independent of whether or not a global climate agreement is achieved.

It wants to reach these goals through the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), Carlrgren said.

Unfortunately, according to WWF, CDM is currently an ineffective system in desperate need of reform. WWF’s concern is that unless serious reforms of the CDM system are enacted, there is a risk that the 40 percent goal will be watered down to a mere 27 percent.

“We would prefer to see a greater portion of these reductions made within Sweden’s own borders,” Mr Gustavsson said.

Polar bear states obliged to take action on climate change at historic meeting

Mar.13 (WWF): An agreement signed in 1973 obliges the five Arctic states with polar bear populations to take action on climate change at a meeting next week, WWF said today.

For the first time in more than 25 years, the Contracting Parties to the 1973 international Agreement for the Conservation of Polar Bears and Their Habitats - Canada, Russia, US, Greenland/Denmark, and Norway - will come together for a formal meeting under the agreement. The meeting, which is hosted by the Norwegian government, will take place in Tromsø, Norway, 17-19 March.

The original historic agreement focused on threats especially from heavy hunting practices that had decimated polar bear populations worldwide. It also committed the states to preservation of the bears’ habitat. Sea ice is a critical part of that habitat, providing a platform for the bears to hunt seals.

WWF urges delegates next week to acknowledge that preserving this Arctic icon will depend on addressing today’s main threat -- climate change. Two-thirds of the world's 20 to 25,000 polar bears will be lost during the next 50 years because of climate change, according to recent comprehensive analyses by the U.S. Geological Survey and the World Conservation Union.

“You cannot protect polar bears without addressing global warming,” says WWF polar bear coordinator Geoff York. “It is widely accepted that we need to keep the global temperature increase below 2 degrees in order to avoid irreversible climate change. The most important action we can take to help preserve polar bears is to slow the rate of climate change, and ultimately to stop it so that their habitat does not entirely disappear.”

Arctic sea ice is disappearing at an alarming rate during the summers, and scientists say the summer ice may disappear entirely sometime between 2013 and 2040.

WWF has worked around the world’s Arctic regions for over 30 years and its polar bear work is led by experts in the field. WWF is the only environmental NGO active in all of the Arctic countries and is a permanent observer to the Arctic Council.

“Delegates at the Tromsø meeting must agree to push their respective countries to commit to urgent and effective climate change action. Anything less would be an abdication of the responsibilities of these nations under the polar bear agreement,” emphasizes York.

WWF expects the representatives of these five polar bear nations to formally call for urgent global actions to significantly reduce the amount of greenhouse gases produced, and show strong leadership internationally to help achieve a fair, effective and science based global climate change agreement in Copenhagen, Denmark in December 2009.

They also must agree to integrate the current and likely future impacts of climate change in all management and planning mechanisms affecting polar bears and their key habitats, and commit to sustainable and long term financing mechanisms for polar bear research and management.

WWF will present at next week’s meeting a draft range-wide Action Plan for polar bears, highlighting the necessary conservation measures that will help polar bears without hurting people who live with the bears, and has encouraged the states to adopt this plan.

“The meeting in Tromsø is an historic and time-limited opportunity to take action to address the rising challenges that face the Arctic today,” says York. “The trend can be turned if governments act now to ensure wise and proactive management of these ecosystems on which both polar bears and we depend.”

The Arctic may be the single most important region on Earth given the key role it has in regulating the world’s climate and storing carbon. The polar bear is the top predator of a fragile ecosystem where small changes can have dramatic consequences far beyond the region itself.

Earth Hour to create a wave of participation around the globe

Mar.10 (WWF): At precisely 8.30pm on March 28 the diesel generators will be switched off on the Chatham Islands, a small archipelago off the east coast of New Zealand, heralding the start of the greatest community event the world has ever witnessed - Earth Hour 2009.

As the first country to flick the switch for the global event, WWF New Zealand's Earth Hour organiser, Dairne Poole sees her country as playing a vital role in Earth Hour’s journey to reach one billion people in over 1,000 cities, across 25 time zones.

"New Zealand will be the first country in the world to turn its lights off for Earth Hour 2009 with 43 councils and local bodies taking part. Even though we are a small nation, we are setting an important example for others to witness and hopefully follow," says Ms Poole.

The global wave of participation will gather momentum through Asia Pacific with major cities such as Sydney, Seoul, Beijing, Hong Kong, Kuala Lumpur, Manila, Singapore, Bangkok, Jakarta, Mumbai and Delhi dimming the lights as millions flick the switch to express their concern for the planet.

Across the globe Earth Hour will provide the platform for a collective voice to be heard from each and every time zone. From the streets of Cape Town to the Hills of Los Angeles, Earth Hour will unite people from all walks of life as the call for action on climate change makes its transglobal journey.

Paris, the ‘City of Lights’ will make a powerful statement by turning off its famous lights, including the Eiffel Tower, for Earth Hour. In the birthplace of democracy, thousands of Athenians will gather to watch the lights go out at the Acropolis in acknowledgement of their vote for action on climate change.

Metropolises across the Americas including New York, Rio de Janeiro, Toronto, Buenos Aires, Chicago, Mexico City and Las Vegas will see their united voice accompanied by unfamiliar lighting – stars.

Earth Hour Executive Director, Mr Andy Ridley, said that Earth Hour signals the beginning of the journey to Copenhagen, where the future of the planet rests with world leaders.

“Earth Hour will focus global attention on addressing the issue of climate change. We are asking one billion people to take part in what is essentially the first global vote for action on climate change by turning off their lights for one hour and casting a vote for earth,” he said.

“Earth Hour hopes to provide a global mandate for action on climate change to the world’s leaders at the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December this year, where an agreement will be made to supersede the Kyoto Protocol.

“It is imperative this agreement leads to a sustainable outcome that suitably addresses climate change. Earth Hour presents an opportunity for every person in the world to have a say in that agreement’s outcome and ensure it isn’t merely an insubstantial token effort by our world’s leaders,” said Mr Ridley.

Geologists Map Rocks to Soak CO2 From Air

6,000 square miles in the US might turn emissions to harmless solids

To slow global warming, scientists are exploring ways to pull carbon dioxide from the air and safely lock it away. Trees already do this naturally through photosynthesis; now, in a new report, geologists have mapped large rock formations in the United States that can also absorb CO2, which they say might be artificially harnessed to do the task at a vastly increased pace.

The report, by scientists at Columbia University’s Earth Institute and the US Geological Survey, shows 6,000 square miles of ultramafic rocks at or near the surface. Originating deep in the earth, these rocks contain minerals that react naturally with carbon dioxide to form solid minerals. Earth Institute scientists are experimenting with ways to speed this natural process, called mineral carbonation. If the technology takes off, geologic formations around the world could provide a vast sink for heat-trapping carbon dioxide released by humans.

Lead author Sam Krevor, a graduate student working through the Earth Institute’s Lenfest Center for Sustainable Energy, says the United States’ ultramafic rocks could be enough to stash more than 500 years of US CO2 production. Conveniently, most of them are clustered in strips along the east and west coasts–some near major cities including New York, Baltimore and San Francisco. "We're trying to show that anyone within a reasonable distance of these rock formations could use this process to sequester as much carbon dioxide as possible," said Krevor.

So-called carbon sequestration has become a hot area of research, but so far, most work has focused on storing liquid or gaseous CO2 underground where there is room: in saline aquifers, depleted oil wells and porous coal seams that are not commercially viable. However, concern about leaks has scientists pursuing natural chemical reactions within the earth to turn the carbon back into a solid.

Ultramafic rocks generally form in earth’s mantle, starting some 12 miles under the surface and extending down hundreds of miles. Bits of these rocks – peridotite, dunite, lherzholite and others – may be squeezed to the surface when continental plates collide with oceanic plates, or, less often, when the interiors of continents thin and develop rifts. Because of their chemical makeup, when the rocks are exposed to carbon dioxide, they react to form common limestone and chalk. A map accompanying the report shows that most such rocks are found in and around coastal mountain ranges, with the greatest concentrations in California, Oregon and Washington, and along the Appalachians from New England to Alabama. Some also occur in the interior, including Montana. Worldwide, other formations are scattered across Eurasia and Australia.

Klaus Lackner, who directs the Lenfest Center, helped originate the idea of mineral sequestration in the 1990s. The US survey is the first of what Lackner hopes will become a global mapping effort. "It's a really big step forward," he said. Krevor produced the map as part of his PhD. dissertation, with help from another Columbia student, Christopher Graves, and two USGS researchers, Bradley Van Gosen and Anne McCafferty. By combining more than a hundred existing maps, the researchers were able to pinpoint the areas nationally where ultramafic rocks are most abundant.

Another rock, common volcanic basalt, also reacts with CO2, and efforts are underway to map this in detail as well. The US Department of Energy has been working on a basalt atlas for the northwestern United States as part of its Big Sky Carbon Sequestration Partnership; extensive mapping in Washington, Oregon and Idaho has already been done through Idaho State University.

The major drawback to natural mineral carbonation is its slow pace: normally, it takes thousands of years for rocks to react with sizable quantities of CO2. But scientists are experimenting with ways to speed the reaction up by dissolving carbon dioxide in water and injecting it into the rock, as well as capturing heat generated by the reaction to accelerate the process. “It offers a way to permanently get rid of CO2 emissions,” said Juerg Matter, a scientist at Columbia’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, where a range of projects is underway.

Matter and his colleague Peter Kelemen are currently researching peridotite formations in Oman, which they say could be used to mineralize as much as 4 billion tons of CO2 a year, or about 12 percent of the world’s annual output. And in Iceland, Matter is about to participate in the first major pilot study on CO2 sequestration in a basalt formation. In May, he and three other Lamont-Doherty scientists will join Reykjavik Energy and others to inject CO2-saturated water into basalt formations there. Over nine months, the rock is expected to absorb 1,600 tons of CO2 generated by a nearby geothermal power plant. Matter and another Lamont-Doherty scientist, David Goldberg, are also involved in a study by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, which will eventually inject 1,000 tons of C02 into formations beneath land owned by a paper mill near Wallula, Wash.

One model is to capture CO2 directly from power-plant smokestacks or other industrial facilities, combine it with water and pipe it into the ground, as in the upcoming Iceland project. Lackner and his colleagues are also working on a process using “artificial trees” that would remove CO2 already emitted into the atmosphere.

Combining rocks and carbon dioxide could provide an added benefit, as Krevor points out. For decades, some large US peridotite formations were mined for asbestos, used for insulation and other purposes. After a link between asbestos and cancer was proven, the substance was banned for most uses, and the mines were closed. Mine tailings left behind, at Belvidere Mountain in Vermont and various sites in California, provide a ready supply of crushed rocks. These potentially hazardous tailings would be rendered harmless during the mineralisation process.

Hungary Burns Carbon Credibility Propping Up Budget

Hungary, a major seller of carbon credits, will weaken its credibility in the growing international carbon markets by using revenues to prop up its budget rather than green its energy production, WWF-Hungary has warned.

Imre Szabo, the Minister of Environment, announced that “the Ministry will cut its annual budget this year by freezing 67 million Euros from its 2009 Kyoto carbon trading revenues”.

According to WWF-Hungary, this will not improve the budget balances, create jobs or decrease the country’s energy dependence on gas and oil but it will bring into question the validity of Hungarian carbon credits.

Hungary had recently settled deals with Spain of 6.6 million AAUs (Assigned Amount Units is the trading unit of the Kyoto carbon trading system) and Belgium of two million AAUs – on the basis of projects to be undertaken through the country’s planned Green Investment Scheme (GIS).

“The Belgians have already criticised Hungary for being late with greening projects and freezing carbon trade revenues will only frustrate them even more”, said György Dallos, climate change programme officer of WWF Hungary.

The Hungarian government already has a track-record in undermining carbon trading revenues, WWF said. Although the Ministry of Environment had prepared the draft of the National Allocation Plan for the years 2008 to 2012 a year ago, the Budapest government has been unable to have it approved by the European Commission so far.

The delay is estimated to have cost Hungary Euro five million due to an inability to fully participate in auction revenues under the European Quota Trading System (ETS) at a time when higher prices prevailed.

Halting or slowing the pace of investment in green technologies is also running counter to world trends of increasing such spending.

“President Barack Obama, Prime Minister Gordon Brown as well the Canadian, the German, the Australian and many other governments agree with Sir Nicholas Stern that supporting green investments in energy efficiency and renewables is an effective tool to save and even create millions of jobs and decrease energy bills,” Dallos said.

The German “Alliance for Work an Environment” programme saved and created 145000 jobs and saw 342000 flats had been retrofitted for energy efficiency in the difficult recession period of the German construction industry between 2001 and 2006, Dallos noted.

“If 1.8 million badly insulated Hungarian family houses were insulated within a five year period, it would create tens of thousands of jobs all over the country,” Dallos said.

“In addition to that, 1.5 million cubic metres of imported Russian gas, as well as three million tons of greenhouse gases, would be saved annually, thereby reducing energy costs. This would bring relief to millions of Hungarians.”

Other WWF Hungary proposals for new and sustainable energy politics include saving hundreds of millions of Euros by eliminating the current gas price support system and increasing “ridiculously low” mining fees on lignite could cut budget deficits and decrease energy dependency.

Additionally the Government could also stop supporting the Vertes Coal Plant through the “coal penny” system collected on every Kilowatt-Hour consumed in the country.

Another efficient way to save government money is stopping the state owned Hungarian Energy Company (MVM) to build a new lignite plant which would never reach a break even given current conditions.

“MVM, the largest state owned company, is sitting on piles of cash thanks to the exceptionally high profits in the last two years,” Dallos said. “So far the government has hardly touched these profits in order to establish a new sustainable energy policy for a brighter future of Hungary.”