The first appeal was rejected on September 28, prompting the new special appeal to the Supreme Court. This appeal asserts that if the prosecutor does not disclose this evidence it is in violation of Article 37(2) of the Japanese Constitution, as well as Article 14(3)(b) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which guarantee the right to a fair trial.
Sato and Suzuki, known as the Tokyo Two, are on trial for intercepting a box of whale meat as part of an investigation into an embezzlement ring within Japan’s so-called “research” whaling programme. However, what should have been a fair trial is being frustrated at every stage by the withholding of evidence that could further prove the embezzlement and by extension Sato and Suzuki’s innocence.
“The Democratic Party of Japan’s landslide election shows that people have had enough of rampant bureaucracy and the corruption it is infamous for,” said Jun Hoshikawa, Executive Director of Greenpeace Japan. “The DPJ has promised to eliminate corruption and the waste of taxpayer money, increase government transparency and adhere to international human rights standards.
“By focussing its efforts on the whaling industry and ensuring the Tokyo Two receive a fair trial, the new government can demonstrate to the Japanese public and the international community that it is committed to its election promises.”
Fundamental to a fair trial is the ability of the defence to access all evidence held by the prosecution, which may demonstrate the innocence of the defendants or mitigate their guilt. Similar failures to disclose evidence have earned Japan repeated criticism from UN human rights bodies. The Tokyo Two case shows that this problem remains.
“The decision to withhold key evidence is a violation of Junichi and Toru’s human rights” said Hoshikawa “And, like its controversial and so-called “scientific” whaling programme, Japan’s 99 per cent conviction rate and its reluctance to allow defendants a fair day in court is an international disgrace.”