Cambodia fails to uphold best practice

The Sesan's fisheries have seen major decline since the construction of the Yali Fall's dam Photo: 3S Protection NetworkLower Sesan 2 dam proposal raises protests.

Plans to construct a large hydropower dam near the confluence of the Sesan and Srepok rivers in Sesan District, Stung Treng Province may be ill-advised given the project’s poor feasibility process, which has not adequately considered the project’s negative environmental and social impacts and the needs of affected communities living up and downstream of the proposed dam-site, reveals a recently published report “Best Practices in Compensation and Resettlement for Large Dams: The Case of the Planned Lower Sesan 2 Hydropower Project in Northeastern Cambodia.”

The report, commissioned by the Rivers Coalition in Cambodia (RCC), and written by environmental impact assessment (EIA) and fisheries expert Dr. Ian G. Baird, documents community concerns regarding the Lower Sesan 2 dam and examines the process of preparing the dam’s Environmental Management Plan through the lens of “best practice” standards at the village, national, regional and international level.

The report was commissioned due to concern expressed by civil society and local communities that the dam, if built and without accurate assessment of local people’s needs, could lead to a loss of livelihood and further impoverishment for affected communities.


Five villages from northeastern Cambodia participated to create videos to express their concerns about the proposed Lower Sesan 2 dam project.



Given that the 75 meter high dam is expected to inundate more than 30,000 ha of land and forest and result in the resettlement of an estimated 5,000 people, the report gave special focus to resettlement and compensation standards, in order to provide recommendations to be considered in Cambodia’s dam-building planning process.

Based upon publicly available documentation regarding the project and discussions held with eleven local communities who would be affected by the dam, the report finds that the Vietnamese company appointed to carry out the dam’s feasibility study, Power Engineering Consulting Company 1 (PECC1), has failed to meet even minimum standards for public participation.


Part Two of the video

The study neglected to consult with communities located upstream and downstream of the dam site and those located inside the planned reservoir were not provided substantial information regarding the dam’s potential impacts. The process was not participatory and did not promote open and meaningful dialogue.

Public participation is considered the most fundamental aspect of any EIA process, with evidence from around the world suggesting that the more the public is involved in assessment processes, the more accurate and useful such processes tend to be. Public participation can also help ensure community support, understanding, and overall cooperation.


Part Three of the video

The Best Practices report is being launched simultaneously to the completion of a review done by the RCC on PECC1’s Environment Impact Assessment for Feasibility Study of Lower Sesan 2 Hydropower Project, Stung Treng Province Cambodia report, dated October 2008, received from the Ministry of Environment in late July.

The EIA review addresses the report’s deficiencies in terms of the impacts the dam would have on local people’s culture and livelihoods, the lack of public consultation, along with recommendations to develop more sustainable forms of renewable energy technologies rather than constructing the dam.